Brilliant case

I have just read the case of Emerald Garment Manufacturing v. CA for the nth time and everytime I just say: "brilliant!" It said it applied the dominancy and holistic test yet in another breath it said that it must not look at the trademark by piecemeal. I mean come on.. Stylistic Mr. Lee and Lee is not confusingly similar. The former could even be considered as a special product of the latter. Come on. Now, any comments?